Freedom of Thought and Speech
It is a common
saying that thought is free. A man can never be hindered from thinking whatever
he chooses. But this natural liberty of private thinking is of little value. If
a thinker is not permitted to express his thoughts, he feels uneasy and disturbed.
Moreover, it is extremely difficult to hide thoughts that have any power over
the mind. If a man is convinced of the truth of his ideas, it is impossible for
him to be silent. Some people prefer to face death rather than conceal their
thoughts. Thus freedom of thought includes freedom of speech. Both are closely
related.
Men have
preferred death and made great sacrifices for the sake of their cherished beliefs.
Socrates drank the cup of poison to justify the integrity of his character and
the truth of his ideas. Galileo suffered torture behind the prison bar because
he had the strong conviction of his thoughts. Crashed under the weight of
torture, he once said that the earth is stationary, but in the same breath he
again said, “No, no, it moves around the sun.” Our Prophet (SAW) suffered
torture because his thoughts and his message were against the old established
ideas of the infidels of Arabia.
Freedom of
thought has often been denied because it is felt to be something dangerous. No
doubt, ideas bring about revolutions more than anything else in the world. The socialistic
revolution of Russia was brought about by the ideas of Karl Marx and Linen. The
great democracy of America came into existence because of the thoughts of some
leaders. Pakistan was also achieved on the basis of some ideology.
There can be no
progress in any sphere of life without freedom of thought. Scientific progress
remained at low point as long as freedom of thought was suppressed in that
field. The scientists were suspected of being in league with the devil. When
science was freed to these impediments, it took rapid progress to make man’s
life happier; it worked wonders in all the branches of life.
In the field of
politics, freedom of thought has been crushed in the era of democracies and
republics. With the growth of democratic governments, the rights of the common
man have been recognized. Now the voters are real masters. The representatives
in the parliament are the servants of the public where there is no freedom of
thought and expression; people suffer under monarchy or dictatorship.
An unrestricted
freedom of thought can sometimes degenerate into a bad thing. It is quite
possible that a group of persons may create misled in their ideas. The state
sometimes feels the necessity of putting restrictions upon such loose thinking.
The extremes are always bad. Suppression of the freedom of thought is as
dangerous as loose thinking. Healthy ideas must be prevailed and unhealthy must
be suppressed.
No comments:
Post a Comment